ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Public and healthcare professionals' perspectives on preventing violence against healthcare workers: A social media crowdsourcing.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safeguarding healers: Methodological and implementation considerations in crowdsourced research on violence against healthcare workers.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Violence against healthcare professionals is the serious global issue. This study aimed to explore strategies to prevent such incidents using a qualitative crowdsourcing approach, gathering perspectives from both the public and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Methods: A Google Form with an open-ended question - "How to prevent violence against healthcare workers" was distributed via social media platforms (Twitter [now X], LinkedIn, Facebook, and WhatsApp) from August 15 to December 14, 2024. Two independent authors analyzed responses thematically and a consensus was reached to finalize the themes. Results: A total of 224 responses were received (181 HCPs, 43 public). Thematic analysis identified several key strategies. The public emphasized security measures, strict legal frameworks (non-bailable offenses, fast-track courts), education and awareness campaigns, institutional responsibility, and de-escalation strategies. HCPs also emphasized enhanced security (police booths, strict visitor controls), institutional policies (zero-tolerance measures, structured reporting systems), better working conditions, communication strategies, public awareness campaigns, and technological solutions. Conclusion: Preventing violence against doctors requires a multifaceted approach, including legal reforms, security enhancements, institutional policies, public awareness, and technology-based safety measures. Collaborative efforts from governments, healthcare institutions, and society are essential to ensuring the safety and well-being of HCPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.