Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624640›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a tribal-state of India: A cross-sectional study.

Tanya Tanu, Dewesh Kumar, Mithilesh Kumar, Vidya Sagar, Prerna Anand, Ravi R Jha, Rishabh K Rana, Sahil N Rajnish, Apoorva Wasnik, N Venkatesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tanya TanuDepartment of Community Medicine, Shaheed Nirmal Mahto Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.
Dewesh KumarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Mithilesh KumarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Vidya SagarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Prerna AnandDepartment of Community Medicine, Medinirai Medical College and Hospital, Palamu, Jharkhand, India.
Ravi R JhaDepartment of Community Medicine, Shaheed Nirmal Mahto Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.
Rishabh K RanaDepartment of Community Medicine, Shaheed Nirmal Mahto Medical College and Hospital, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India.
Sahil N RajnishDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Apoorva WasnikDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
N VenkateshDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The delayed acceptance or abject refusal to take vaccines despite the availability of vaccination services has been termed as vaccine hesitancy (VH). The 5C Model of VH includes Confidence, Convenience, Complacency, and Communication as major determinants of VH in the population. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted among vaccinees enrolled at the Vaccination Center of the largest tertiary hospital in the tribal state of Jharkhand. The study was a cross-sectional study aimed to determine the extent of VH for COVID-19 vaccines prevalent in the study population and the associated factors. The study subjects included vaccinees at RIMS, Ranchi Vaccination Center. It included all subjects aged 18 years and above, consenting to be a part of the study. Study participants were recruited from the line list prepared for COVID-19 vaccination from the Co-win portal. A total of 625 participants were recruited. A predesigned, pretested, semistructured questionnaire was administered to all the study participants. Results: Out of the 625 recruited participants, VH was found in 165 subjects. The factor that is the biggest contributor to VH was the fear of the potential long-/short-term side effects of the vaccine (31.7%), which was followed by the fear of the pain from the shot (14.9%) and distrust in the vaccines due to shorter clinical trials (14.9%). Conclusion: V is a significant, living phenomenon that is translating into geographical clustering of epidemics and requires attention on both the micro- and macrolevels to be addressed successfully.

Indexed as

Preventive medicinetherapeuticsvaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID41624640
PMCPMC12858107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.