ArticleWorld journal of emergency medicine2026
Normal initial lactate level in sepsis patients: is lactate still useful for prognosis prediction?
Article in World journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between early blood lactate trajectories and mortality in neonates: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis is a highly heterogeneous organ dysfunction syndrome. There is limited evidence regarding phenotypes and clinical outcomes in sepsis patients with initial normal lactate levels. We sought to identify the lactate-based clinical phenotypes and outcomes of sepsis patients.
methodsThe Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) and eICU databases were used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Adult sepsis patients were included. Lactate was measured via blood gas, and the same assay type was used across both databases. Serial lactate measurements were analyzed via a two-point classification system based on the highest values recorded during two consecutive 24-hour periods following ICU admission. The first measurement window (T1) comprised the initial 24 h post-admission, whereas the second window (T2) covered 24-48 h post-admission. The lactate difference was defined as the numerical change between the highest lactate level at T2 and the highest level at T1. The time interval between these two measurements was fixed, with T2 commencing immediately after T1, together encompassing the first 48 h post-ICU admission. A normal lactate level was defined as ≤2 mmol/L, and an elevated level was defined as >2 mmol/L. Sepsis patients were stratified into four trajectory phenotypes: (1) normal‒normal (N‒N); (2) normal-elevated (N‒E); (3) elevated-normal (E‒N); and (4) elevated-elevated (E‒E). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.
resultsThis study enrolled 6,926 sepsis patients. The clinical phenotypes of the sepsis patients were as follows: N‒N (24.4%), N‒E (3.8%), E‒N (36.4%), and E‒E (35.3%). The in-hospital mortality rates of sepsis patients with the four phenotypes from the MIMIC-IV and eICU databases were as follows (N‒N: 18.9% vs. 17.6%,
conclusionIn sepsis patients with normal initial lactate levels, serial lactate measurements could be valuable for prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.