Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624573›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Comparative effects of wheat bran modifications by microwaving, steam explosion and solid-state fermentation on reconstituted dough properties and corresponding noodles qualities.

Feng Kong, Yue Li, Hongrun Lu, Yishuai Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Feng KongSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Food Engineering, Shandong Key Laboratory of Applied Technology for Protein and Peptide Drugs, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Yue LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Food Engineering, Shandong Key Laboratory of Applied Technology for Protein and Peptide Drugs, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Hongrun LuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Food Engineering, Shandong Key Laboratory of Applied Technology for Protein and Peptide Drugs, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.
Yishuai DingSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Food Engineering, Shandong Key Laboratory of Applied Technology for Protein and Peptide Drugs, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wheat bran, rich in fiber and bioactives, often impairs dough and final product quality upon incorporation. This study employed microwaving (MWB), steam explosion (SWB), and solid-state fermentation to modify wheat bran to improve its functionality in dough and noodles. All modifications reduced particle size (15.04%-29.77%) and increased bran surface area, improving dough water absorption. Notably, SWB drastically increased the content of phenolics (90.23%), flavonoids (2.65-fold), and water-extractable arabinoxylans (6.23-fold) while reducing bran crystallinity indices. The modifications differentially improved dough: MWB prolonged development and stability time, whereas SWB improved elasticity (increased G' and reduced tanδ) and disulfide bond content, indicating a strengthened gluten network. Consequently, noodles incorporating SWB achieved superior sensory scores, particularly in palatability and smoothness. Overall, steam explosion might be an effective bran modification strategy for balancing nutritional enrichment with enhanced dough rheology and noodle quality. These findings provide mechanistic and practical insights for cereal bran valorization.

Indexed as

NoodlesQuality characteristicsSteam explosionWheat bran modificationWhole wheat dough

Identifiers

PMID41624573
PMCPMC12860365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.