ReviewEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Digital twins and simulations in transcatheter coronary and structural heart interventions.
Review in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automating the triage of rheumatology outpatient referrals: a comparative evaluation of 23 large language models under simple and advanced prompting.Rheumatology international · 2026Article
- Article
- Virtual reality in percutaneous coronary intervention: from coronary imaging and procedural planning to patient care.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography as a Gatekeeper for Invasive Coronary Assessment Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- The Cardiologist Driving Synthetic AI: The TIMA Method for Clinically Supervised Synthetic Data Generation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital twin technology, which enables the creation of patient-specific virtual models, is increasingly applied in interventional cardiology to support personalized procedural planning and risk assessment. This review examines current applications of digital twins in coronary and structural heart interventions, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). In coronary interventions, digital simulations based on computed tomography or angiography can estimate physiological indices, guide stent placement, and predict post-procedural hemodynamics. For structural interventions, simulation platforms generate 3D reconstructions from imaging data to model device-anatomy interactions, support valve sizing, and assess risks such as paravalvular leak or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Several tools are already integrated into clinical workflows, with growing evidence supporting their utility in improving planning accuracy and procedural outcomes. Nonetheless, broader adoption is limited by challenges related to model validation, data integration, workflow complexity, and regulatory constraints. In particular, validation remains difficult for procedures performed less frequently, such as TMVR. Ongoing developments in artificial intelligence and computational methods may enhance model speed and accuracy, enabling wider and more efficient clinical use. Digital twin technologies represent a promising direction for advancing precision medicine in transcatheter coronary and structural heart interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.