Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624558›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

An artificial intelligence model for electrocardiogram detection of occlusion myocardial infarction: a retrospective study to reduce false-positive cath lab activations.

Benjamin L Cooper, Evan A Genova, Carrie A Bakunas, Catherine E Reynolds, Benjamin Karfunkle, Nils P Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin L CooperDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-6828
Evan A GenovaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Carrie A BakunasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Catherine E ReynoldsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Benjamin KarfunkleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0170-4539
Nils P JohnsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medicine Center, UTHealth Houston, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, 6431 Fannin St., JJL 260, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0897-2301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Existing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) alert pathways that rely on traditional STEMI criteria perform suboptimally. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) model to detect acute occlusion myocardial infarction (OMI) from the routine 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and, specifically, its potential to reduce false-positive activations. Methods and results: Consecutive adults managed via the STEMI pathway were included from a tertiary academic medical centre between January 2022 and December 2023. Cases without an available ECG for review, death prior to catheterization, or alternative reasons for activation (i.e. electrical instability or urgent interventions) were excluded. Pre-coronary angiography tracings were interpreted via the AI tool. Test characteristics were compared against traditional STEMI criteria. The primary outcome was the number of avoidable false-positive activations. During the 2-year study period, there were 454 activations, 150 were excluded, and 304 cases with unique ECGs were included in the study cohort. There were 118 (38.8%) false-positive activations, of which 86 (72.9%) were correctly predicted by the AI model. Its test characteristics for identifying true positives were superior compared with traditional STEMI criteria for a sensitivity of 89.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 84.0-92.9] vs. 68.3% (95% CI: 61.3-74.5), specificity 72.9% (95% CI: 64.2-80.1) vs. 51.7% (95% CI: 42.8-60.5), and accuracy 82.9% (95% CI: 78.3-86.7) vs. 61.8 (95% CI: 56.3-67.1). Conclusion: The AI model is superior to traditional STEMI criteria for detecting OMI and has the potential to reduce false-positive catheterization lab activations. It can be a useful decision-aid for catheterization lab activation.

Indexed as

AIElectrocardiogramOcclusion myocardial infarctionPMcardioQueen of HeartsST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID41624558
PMCPMC12853124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.