Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624506›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2026

Predicting the path to guided ICBT success across referral pathway for moderate depression and anxiety disorders.

Jill Bjarke, Rolf Gjestad, Tine Nordgreen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jill BjarkeResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Rolf GjestadResearch Department, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tine NordgreenResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent and burdensome conditions. Guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (guided ICBT) is an effective treatment option, yet outcome prediction has shown inconsistent results. By analyzing patient-, treatment-, and system-related predictors within a single integrative framework, we aim to support a more nuanced understanding of what works for whom in which context. Method: Naturalistic, open predictor-study in routine care comparing symptom reduction from pre-treatment (Pre) to post-treatment (Post), and from Pre to 6-month follow-up (FU), across general practitioner (GP) and self-referral pathways for depression and anxiety disorders. Patients self-reported symptoms Pre, Post, and FU. Symptom severity and change over time were assessed transdiagnostically applying a harmonized outcome score. Patient-related predictors were gender, age, education, employment status, duration of illness, and social support, while treatment-related predictors were treatment credibility and self-efficacy. The system-related predictor was referral pathways. Results: In the total sample ( Conclusion: Using a novel integrative approach, we identified unique adjusted associations between predictors across patient-, treatment-, and system-related predictors and symptom reduction in guided ICBT. Referral pathway moderated their relevance, underscoring the importance of contextual factors in shaping treatment response in routine care.

Indexed as

Anxiety disordersDepressionGeneral practitioner referralGuided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapyPrediction analysesRoutine clinical practiceSelf-referral

Identifiers

PMID41624506
PMCPMC12856857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.