ArticleAdvances in ophthalmology practice and research
Comparative analysis of three toric intraocular lenses: clinical outcomes and rotational stability in patients with corneal astigmatism.
Article in Advances in ophthalmology practice and research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative study on rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients with low astigmatism: vertical versus horizontal implantation.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purposes: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and rotational stability of three different toric intraocular lenses (IOLs; Tecnis ZCT, Tecnis ZCU and AcrySof IQ) used in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and investigate potential variables that may impact the rotational stability. Methods: This retrospective study involved 126 eyes from 111 patients who received FLACS with toric IOL implantation. Patients were allocated to three groups: one received the AcrySof IQ toric IOL, another the Tecnis ZCT, and the other the Tecnis ZCU. Ophthalmic parameters such as axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and white-to-white (WTW) distance, were determined preoperatively. Postoperative evaluations were conducted at 3 months. Results: No significant differences in BCDVA or residual astigmatism (RAS) postoperatively were observed among the groups ( Conclusions: The three toric IOLs showed comparable visual and refractive outcomes at 3 months. The Tecnis ZCT demonstrated inferior performance in rotational stability and postoperative alignment compared to the AcrySof IQ and Tecnis ZCU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.