ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Ascending aortic length across a large population presenting to the emergency room, a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aortic dissection often occurs at diameters below surgical thresholds, underscoring the need for better predictive markers. Ascending aortic length has emerged as a potential morphologic risk factor, but normal population data are limited. This study aimed to establish normative aortic length values by age and sex and develop a tool to predict dissection risk. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1030 (986 without and 44 with type A dissection) emergency room patients (from 1,445 screened) who underwent ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography between 2019 and 2025, excluding those with prior aortic surgery or disease. Ascending aortic length, from the sinotubular junction to the brachiocephalic trunk, was measured using semi-automated centerline tools. Logistic and LASSO regression models estimated type A dissection probability based on aortic length, age, height, and sex. Results: Mean ascending aortic length was 70.7 ± 11.6 mm in men and 64.1 ± 11.4 mm in women. Patients with acute type A dissection (n = 44) had significantly longer aortas (men: 93.9 ± 20.5 mm; women: 90.0 ± 18.5 mm; p < 0.001). Aortic length was the strongest independent predictor (OR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.10-1.17, p < 0.001). A reduced model including only aortic length showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.871; sensitivity = 0.773; specificity = 0.867; PPV = 0.206; NPV = 0.988). Conclusion: Ascending aortic length increases with age and is markedly greater in patients with acute type A dissection. We provide normative reference tables by age and sex and a logistic model for individualized risk estimation of dissection at the time of the exam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.