Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026

Ascending aortic length across a large population presenting to the emergency room, a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Thomas Saliba, Gabriella Giandotti Gomar, Olivier Cappeliez, Yasser Alemán-Gómez, Guillaume Fahrni, David Rotzinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas SalibaRadiology Department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gabriella Giandotti GomarThoracic surgery department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivier CappeliezBraine L'Alleud Hospital (CHIREC), Braine L'Alleud, Belgium.
Yasser Alemán-GómezRadiology Department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Guillaume FahrniRadiology Department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
David RotzingerRadiology Department, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aortic dissection often occurs at diameters below surgical thresholds, underscoring the need for better predictive markers. Ascending aortic length has emerged as a potential morphologic risk factor, but normal population data are limited. This study aimed to establish normative aortic length values by age and sex and develop a tool to predict dissection risk. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1030 (986 without and 44 with type A dissection) emergency room patients (from 1,445 screened) who underwent ECG-gated thoracic CT angiography between 2019 and 2025, excluding those with prior aortic surgery or disease. Ascending aortic length, from the sinotubular junction to the brachiocephalic trunk, was measured using semi-automated centerline tools. Logistic and LASSO regression models estimated type A dissection probability based on aortic length, age, height, and sex. Results: Mean ascending aortic length was 70.7 ± 11.6 mm in men and 64.1 ± 11.4 mm in women. Patients with acute type A dissection (n = 44) had significantly longer aortas (men: 93.9 ± 20.5 mm; women: 90.0 ± 18.5 mm; p < 0.001). Aortic length was the strongest independent predictor (OR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.10-1.17, p < 0.001). A reduced model including only aortic length showed excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.871; sensitivity = 0.773; specificity = 0.867; PPV = 0.206; NPV = 0.988). Conclusion: Ascending aortic length increases with age and is markedly greater in patients with acute type A dissection. We provide normative reference tables by age and sex and a logistic model for individualized risk estimation of dissection at the time of the exam.

Indexed as

Aortic lengthAscending aortaCT-scanTabletype A dissection

Identifiers

PMID41624495
PMCPMC12854046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.