ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2026
Comparison of two ablation methods in benign thyroid nodules: Radiofrequency ablation and non-cooled microwave ablation.
Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of cooled and uncooled microwave ablation for the treatment of parathyroid adenomas.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates the effectiveness and complication rates of a non-cooled microwave ablation (MWA) system compared to a radiofrequency ablation (RFA) system for treating benign thyroid nodules. Material and Methods: Between October 2022 and July 2023, 56 patients (38 females, mean age: 51.75±10.7 years) with benign thyroid nodules, confirmed twice by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), were included. Ultrasound (US) guidance was used to treat 62 nodules under local anesthesia. Nodule volume, diameters, and echogenicity were assessed before and after the procedures. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 21. Results: At 3, 6, and 12 months, volume reduction was significantly greater in the non-cooled MWA group compared to the RFA group ( Conclusion: The non-cooled MWA system demonstrated superior efficacy compared to RFA, with similar procedural times and complication rates. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.