Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624462›Full record

ReviewActa informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH2025

Global Perspectives on Renal Transplantation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Adult and Geriatric Populations in Europe and Indonesia.

Athaya Febriantyo Purnomo, Nurul Cholifah Lutfiana, Adilla Shafryantyo Purnomo, Azzahra Syadza Nasywantya Purnomo, Ilham Satriawan, R Mohamad Javier

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Athaya Febriantyo PurnomoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
Nurul Cholifah LutfianaDepartment of Biomedicine and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Adilla Shafryantyo PurnomoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
Azzahra Syadza Nasywantya PurnomoFaculty of Medicine, Universitas YARSI, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ilham SatriawanFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
R Mohamad JavierDepartment of Cardiovascular, Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has become a significant global health issue, especially among the aging population. Renal transplantation is considered the most effective treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), yet disparities exist in its accessibility and outcomes across different regions. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the perspectives and outcomes of renal transplantation in adult and geriatric patients with CKD in Europe and Indonesia, highlighting differences in healthcare systems, patient management, and socio-cultural considerations. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, focusing on publications from the last 10 years. Studies involving adult and elderly CKD patients undergoing renal transplantation in both Europe and Indonesia were analyzed for themes related to access, outcomes, quality of life, and post-transplant management. Results: European countries generally demonstrated more structured transplantation programs, better post-operative care, and higher graft survival rates due to strong infrastructure and funding. In contrast, Indonesian patients faced challenges such as limited donor availability, economic constraints, and lower awareness about transplantation. Geriatric patients in both regions exhibited more complications post-transplantation compared to younger adults, but still benefited in terms of survival and quality of life. Discussion: Disparities between Europe and Indonesia in renal transplantation stem from differences in healthcare access, government support, and patient education. Cultural and ethical issues also influence organ donation rates. Despite challenges, renal transplantation remains a viable option for geriatric patients, especially with proper selection and monitoring. Conclusion: While renal transplantation offers improved outcomes for CKD patients globally, substantial disparities remain between regions. Efforts to enhance transplantation programs in developing countries like Indonesia are crucial, especially in addressing the needs of the aging population.

Indexed as

Chronic Kidney DiseaseEuropeGeriatricIndonesiaRenal Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID41624462
PMCPMC12858263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.