ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Health-related Quality of Life in Localized and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Patient-reported Outcome Measures.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer care. We investigated the effects of treatment for both localized (M0) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) on generic and cancer-specific HRQoL up to 15 wk after diagnosis. Methods: Patients were selected from the National PROspective infrastructure for renal cell carcinoma (PRO-RCC), including M0 and mRCC patients who participated in the HRQoL assessment. HRQoL was measured using the Dutch validated European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline (T Key findings and limitations: A total of 295 patients were included, of whom 217 (73.6%) had M0 disease and 78 (26.4%) had mRCC. At follow-up, 89 patients with M0 disease (41%) and 38 with mRCC (48.7%) completed the T Conclusions and clinical implications: Patients with M0 disease and mRCC experienced improvements in several functional and symptom domains within 15 wk after diagnosis. Future studies should assess the impact of these changes on treatment continuation and/or responses. Patient summary: We looked at health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with localized or metastatic kidney cancer. In general, both groups reported improvements in emotional, social, and physical wellbeing at 15 weeks after their diagnosis, and results suggest further changes at 6 months after diagnosis. Patients reported improvements in symptoms such as fatigue, pain, sleep, and appetite. Our results indicate that patients can find meaningful improvements in their quality of life shortly after diagnosis and initiation of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.