Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624449›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2026

Nephrology Survey on Reproductive Health and Kidney Disease.

Nedas Semaska, Rachael Nolan, Darren Lee, Silvi Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nedas SemaskaMS3, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Rachael NolanDepartment of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Darren LeeMS3, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Silvi ShahDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects ≤6% of females of childbearing age, with pregnancy posing considerable health risks. Despite this, contraceptive use among this population remains low, and nephrologists' perspectives remain underexplored. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used a 52-item electronic survey of US nephrologists to assess their practices and confidence related to reproductive health care for female patients with CKD. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were used to explore associations with provider characteristics. Results: Among 104 respondents, most practiced in academic settings, and more than half had seen > 15 female patients of childbearing age with CKD in the past year. Reproductive health issues were infrequently addressed, with most "rarely/never" discussing sexual dysfunction (82%), menstrual disorders (59%), or contraception (31%). More than half were "not at all confident" in managing sexual dysfunction (54%), followed by menstrual disorders (42%). Common barriers included lack of standardized guidelines (39%), limited time (38%), and knowledge gaps (33%). More than half reported that the absence of guidelines decreased their likelihood of counseling. A patient receiving a kidney transplant was the factor that most positively influenced the provider's decision to provide reproductive health counseling. Nephrologists who saw more female patients annually reported significantly higher confidence in managing contraception (30% vs. 11%, Conclusion: US nephrologists reported limited confidence and inconsistent practices in reproductive counseling, underscoring the need for a standardized approach and best practices at a national level to guide care for female patients.

Indexed as

chronic kidney disease (CKD)contraceptionnephrologyreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID41624449
PMCPMC12857325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.