ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Alterations in pelvic kinematics with speed, incline, and fatigue in female runners.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In running, female runners show higher overuse-injury rates, partly due to sex-specific anatomy and biomechanics. Pelvic motion is central to lower-limb kinematics, however, female-specific responses are underexamined. This study tested how running speed, incline, and fatigue influence pelvic rotation, tilt, and obliquity in recreational female runners. Methods: Twenty-two females completed treadmill trials at 10, 12, and 14 km/h on level ground and at 10 km/h with 5% and 10% inclines, before and after a 30-minute run at 80% heart-rate reserve to induce moderate fatigue. A 3D motion-capture system recorded pelvic rotation, tilt, and obliquity at heel-strike, toe-off, peak values, and ranges of motion. Linear mixed-effects models assessed main and interaction effects; asymmetry was quantified via symmetry index between left and right gait cycles. Results: Higher speeds increased peak pelvic rotation, tilt, and obliquity, and enlarged rotation and obliquity range of motion. A 10% incline raised peak pelvic obliquity and rotation and increased range of motion for rotation, tilt, and obliquity; a 5% incline had no measurable effect. Fatigue increased peak pelvic rotation and range of motion for rotation and tilt. A fatigue × 10% incline interaction showed that incline-related increases in tilt range of motion observed when fresh were reduced under fatigue. Pelvic tilt asymmetry rose with speed. Discussion: Speed, incline, and fatigue each modulate pelvic kinematics in recreational female runners, with effect sizes often exceeding reports from mixed-sex samples. Notably, greater frontal-plane motion at higher speeds and increased transverse-plane motion with incline and fatigue may heighten loads on the iliotibial band, hamstrings, or lumbar spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.