ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2025
Ballistic Distal Radius Fractures: A Single-Center Experience in Management and Outcomes.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the upper extremities can be devastating and often require surgical treatment. Ballistic injuries to the distal radius in particular present a complex challenge for hand surgeons because of concerns of bony comminution, neurovascular injury, and injury to surrounding structures. This study compares the demographics, management, and complications of nonballistic versus ballistic distal radius fractures (DRFs). Methods: In this retrospective study, patients over the age of 16 years with radiographically confirmed DRFs were reviewed from 2018 to 2023. Demographic data, surgical details, and postoperative complication data were collected. X-ray imaging was evaluated for fracture healing. In addition to comparison of all patients, 1:1 matched cohort comparison was conducted, controlling for age, smoking, and fracture classification. Results: Of the 265 patients, 21 had DRFs due to GSWs, and 244 sustained DRFs from other mechanisms. GSW patients were significantly younger and predominantly male. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen classification demonstrated higher intra- and extra-articular comminution in GSW patients, and GSW patients had higher rates of distal radioulnar joint instability and carpal fractures. Additional injuries outside the upper extremity and neurovascular symptoms were also more common in GSW patients. GSW patients were more likely to undergo surgery and had longer times to surgery. Despite the delayed surgical intervention, no differences were observed in fixation methods, time to full weight bearing, or complications between groups. After 1:1 matching, there remained a significantly higher proportion of men in the GSW cohort, a higher rate of carpal fractures, a higher rate of nonhand injuries, and a greater time to surgery in the GSW cohort. There remained no significant difference in complications. Conclusions: Because of their complexity, GSWs to the upper extremities present considerable management issues. The present study compares ballistic to nonballistic injuries to the distal radius. Although there were differences in presentation and surgical management, there were no significant differences in complications. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.