ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2026
Challenges and future perspectives of enhanced passive safety surveillance of influenza vaccines in Europe.
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postmarketing surveillance is critical for confirming the safety profile of vaccines following regulatory approval. This article contributes to the ongoing discussion on safety surveillance strategies for seasonal influenza vaccines in Europe. We examine the implementation of enhanced passive safety surveillance (EPSS) for seasonal influenza vaccines from season 2015/16 through season 2023/24, as conducted by a Marketing Authorization Holder in accordance with European Medicines Agency guidelines. We describe the evolution of data collection methods of EPSS studies conducted across nine seasons in Finland, United Kingdom, Republic of Ireland, Denmark, and Germany with different influenza vaccine formulations. Exposure data were prospectively collected in vaccination cards at the time of vaccination, while safety data collection evolved from telephone calls to electronic reporting systems. The use of an electronic system in recent seasons facilitated adverse drug reaction reporting by the vaccinees and improved real-time monitoring and accurate data collection. Operational challenges included country and site selection constraints and difficulty achieving target sample sizes and age group representation within short recruitment windows. Reporting rates varied across seasons, countries, and vaccine formulations, potentially influenced by factors such as vaccine reactogenicity, population demographics, and reporting behaviors. Future perspectives suggest the need for a unified Europe-wide safety surveillance system to enhance collaboration among regulatory bodies, public health agencies, and vaccine manufacturers, ultimately contributing to a more robust and reliable safety framework for influenza vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.