ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026
Different Expressions and Methylation Patterns of cGAS and STING in Cervical Cancer.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in the application of gene methylation detection in cervical cancer screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial reprogramming in cervical cancer: crosstalk with tumor immunity, HPV oncogenic signaling, and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Different Expressions and Methylation Patterns of cGAS and STING in Cervical Cancer.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The cGAS-STING pathway has established itself as a critical innate immune pathway that has the ability to significantly affect tumor initiation and progression. The expression, methylation, immunological functions, and prognostic importance of cGAS-STING pathway-related genes in cervical squamous cancer (CESC) patients have not yet been thoroughly elucidated. Methods: First, we explored the expression of cGAS and STING in cervical carcinoma samples from TCGA by comparing the mRNA and protein levels of cGAS and STING in both TCGA cervical tumor patient samples and cervical tumor cell lines. Second, we examined the CD4 Results: In both cervical tumor patient samples and cell lines, we observed that cGAS is increased, whereas STING is decreased in tumors, which leads to decreased CD4 Conclusions: Our work identified different expressions and methylation patterns of cGAS and STING in cervical cancer and their correlation with immune T cell infiltration and prognosis. More mechanistic study is needed to understand the cGAS-STING pathway in cervical squamous tumor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.