Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624258›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026

PMMA-augmentation of the spinous process as an enhancing-protective measure against bone failure in "through the spinous process-vertebropexy".

Alexandros Tsolakidis, Marie-Rosa Fasser, Oliver Wigger, Mazda Farshad, Jonas Widmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandros TsolakidisDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Marie-Rosa FasserSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Oliver WiggerSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mazda FarshadDepartment of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonas WidmerSpine Biomechanics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vertebropexy, a semi-rigid spinal stabilization technique, utilizes the spinous process(SP) as an anchor point for stabilizing tendon-grafts or flexible cerclages. In its primary form, it entailed drilling into the bone of 2 adjacent SPs and threading the materials through the holes. Biomechanical studies have identified the SP as the weakest part of the vertebrae, while cadaveric studies have demonstrated a higher bone failure rate with osteoporosis. We investigated whether cement augmentation of the SP could enhance the biomechanical strength and reduce the fracture-risk in the setting of first-generation Vertebropexy. Methods: Following computed tomographic analysis and measurement of the bone mineral density, 12 lumbar segments were divided in 2 groups (Osteoporotic/ Nonosteoporotic) and then fixed in custom-made 3D-printed clamps. The SPs of 6 segments underwent cement augmentation (PMMA-Group), and a CT scan confirmed adequate augmentation. The other 6 segments remained uncemented. (Native-Group). Posterior decompression, drilling, and instrumentation with bovine tendons were then conducted. Torque-to-failure stress tests were performed on a biaxial static testing machine. Results: The cement-augmentation of the SP significantly increases the torque-to-failure in flexion (p=.00037/ Median & IQR: 13.0 & 5.2 Nm in the Native-Group vs. 26.5 & 11.1 Nm in the PMMA-Group), regardless of the bone quality (p=.008). A statistically significant difference in torque-to-failure between Osteoporotic and NonOsteoporotic groups inside the PMMA and Native groups was determined (p=.015 and p=.025, respectively). A statistically significant correlation between bone density and failure torque was not detected in this cohort, possibly due to the limited sample size (Spearman 0.276, p=.192). A comparison between the torque-to-failure of the Native-NonOsteoporotic SPs and that of the PMMA-Osteoporotic showed no statistical significance (p=.240). Conclusions: Based on the findings of this small-sample cadaveric study, cement-augmentation of the spinous processes can multiply the torque-to-failure/fracture in both osteoporotic and nonosteoporotic conditions and may be used as a salvage technique in first-generation vertebropexy procedures that compromise the spinous process.

Indexed as

AllograftCement-augmentationFusionLigamentLumbar spinePMMASpinal stabilizationSpinous processVertebropexyXenograft

Identifiers

PMID41624258
PMCPMC12856172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.