ReviewProgress in rehabilitation medicine2026
Applications of Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.
Review in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peripheral magnetic stimulation is increasingly used to treat dysfunctions associated with various disorders. However, there is currently no consensus regarding its efficacy across specific populations, disease conditions, intervention settings, treatment durations, or outcomes. This scoping review aimed to identify, summarize, and map relevant literature on peripheral magnetic stimulation, clarifying its application by disease type, treatment site, functional impairments, outcomes, and intervention setting. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across several databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PEDro. Studies that examined the impact of peripheral magnetic stimulation on dysfunction across all disease types and populations were included. Results: Of 804 screened articles, 97 met the inclusion criteria. Peripheral magnetic stimulation was primarily used for musculoskeletal, neurological, and incontinence-related diseases, focusing on disease-specific outcomes related to muscle and physical function in the affected areas. Conversely, its use in internal diseases was predominantly limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with few studies addressing its efficacy in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes mellitus. Furthermore, peripheral magnetic stimulation settings varied widely, even when applied to similar diseases or dysfunctions. Conclusions: Peripheral magnetic stimulation is primarily used to treat musculoskeletal, neurological, and incontinence-related diseases, with outcomes centered on disease-specific assessments of muscle and physical function. However, its application in internal diseases remains limited, especially in cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes mellitus. In addition, standardized peripheral magnetic stimulation prescriptions have not yet been established. Future studies should emphasize its implementation in underserved diseases and dysfunctions and establish standardized treatment protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.