ReviewImmuno-oncology technology2026
Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with melanoma and pre-existing autoimmune conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Immuno-oncology technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Melanoma patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases (AIDs) have been excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), due to a risk of flare and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). Materials and methods: A comprehensive literature search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus was carried out. Studies of melanoma patients with pre-existing AIDs were included. Two reviewers used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes assessed included all-grade and grade 3 or 4 Results: Thirty-two percent of patients with AIDs developed a flare, with 80% requiring immunosuppression. In patients with AIDs, meta-analysis revealed a higher risk of all-grade irAEs [risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.33, Conclusions: Melanoma patients with pre-existing AIDs are at significant risk of flare with ICI use. These patients had an increased risk of irAEs of any grade. Although there was a trend towards increased risk of severe irAEs, this was not statistically significant. irAEs did not result in treatment-related deaths, and there were no differences in treatment response. Risks should be discussed, coupled with close monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.