Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624224›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Ventral skull based approach to whole-brain extraction in mice.

Alexandra N Buntin-Nakamura, Daniel Quintana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra N Buntin-NakamuraDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley.
Daniel QuintanaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of California, Berkeley.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head fixation combined with cranial window, GRIN lens, or prism implantation are common techniques in systems neuroscience for real-time imaging of neural activity. A critical step in these experiments is the removal of these implants and subsequent histological processing to assess tissue integrity and verify opsin expression. However, removing implants from the dorsal surface of the skull often causes traumatic damage to the underlying cortex. This study introduces a novel technique for intact brain excision that removes dorsal implants while preserving cortical integrity. Instead of the conventional dorsal approach, which often risks cortical damage, the skull is resected from the ventral side, allowing the implant to remain in place for post-mortem analysis. This approach:•Enables dorsal implants to remain embedded in the brain during fixation.•Improves reproducibility by standardizing the extraction method, reducing variability introduced by traditional dorsal implant removal.•Preserves tissue integrity that would otherwise be compromised by removing the implant from fresh brain tissue.

Indexed as

Cranial implantsNeuroscience methodNeurosurgical methodVentral dissectionWhole-brain extraction

Identifiers

PMID41624224
PMCPMC12856142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.