Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624223›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Updated method to incorporate soil nutrient heterogeneity caused by urine excretion into a process-based simulation model.

Val Snow, Dean Holzworth, Rogerio Cichota, Olle Hartvigson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Val SnowBioeconomy Science Institute of New Zealand, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Dean HolzworthCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Forest Hill, Australia.
Rogerio CichotaBioeconomy Science Institute of New Zealand, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Olle HartvigsonBioeconomy Science Institute of New Zealand, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pasture production and nutrient cycling through grazed pastures are inherently difficult to model with process-based simulation models. This arises because the urine depositions from grazing livestock create extreme heterogeneity in soil nutrient concentrations and dynamics. They result in relatively small patches of soil with very high mineral nitrogen (N) concentrations with the remainder of the soil with low N concentrations. These variations are such that simply averaging over them will somewhat overestimate pasture production and vastly underestimate environmental losses such as N leaching and greenhouse gas emissions. Explicit representation of the heterogeneity will allow correct simulation of environmental losses, but this comes at the expense of long runtimes in simulations - runtimes that can make the model intractable to use. Here we outline an update to an existing method that preserves the most important part of the heterogeneity while still allowing tractable runtimes for simulations. While we applied this method to grazed pasture systems, it could be extended to other sources of heterogeneity such as spatially variable fertiliser management. A method to model non-uniform applications of nutrients to soils in simulation models Captures the major implications of the non-uniformity on soil and plant processes The method is computationally efficient resulting in tractable simulations.

Indexed as

DenitrificationNitrogen leachingSimulation model designSoil carbon and nitrogenTransient heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID41624223
PMCPMC12857185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.