Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41624213›Full record

ArticleJHLT open2026

An international perspective on allocation rules for combined heart-lung transplantation.

A M Holm, I Bello, A Sandiumenge, G Snell, J Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A M HolmDepartment of Respiratory Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
I BelloThoracic Surgery Department, Vall d´Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
A SandiumengeDonations and Transplantation of Organs, Tissues, and Cells, VHIR, Barcelona, Spain.
G SnellLung Transplant Service, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J GottliebRespiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the global numbers of lung transplants have increased, the annual numbers of heart-lung transplants have steadily declined over the last decades, combined transplants globally being only about 2% of heart or lung transplant numbers. Although patients eligible for a combined heart-lung transplant may be sicker than those that may be treated with lung transplant only, the increased resource requirement and the dwindling surgical proficiency may have contributed to the declining number of procedures performed. The priority granted to patients requiring a combined transplant in the different organ allocation systems throughout the world vary. In some areas, the candidates for combined transplants compete with urgently ill heart transplant candidates; in others they compete with the lung transplant candidates, and in some there are no defined rules to prioritize those needing a combined heart-lung transplant. The ethical, legal, and practical justifications for the system chosen is often not explicit.

Indexed as

AllocationEthicsGlobalHeart-lung transplantLung transplant

Identifiers

PMID41624213
PMCPMC12857351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.