SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Does early pregnancy exposure to macrolide antibiotics lead to major birth defects? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Macrolide antibiotics are frequently used to treat infections in women during early pregnancy. However, the association between early pregnancy exposure to macrolide antibiotics and major birth defects remains uncertain. Clarifying this risk is crucial for public health and clinical decision-making. Methods: This study systematically searched five databases-Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus-for studies exploring the relationship between early pregnancy exposure to macrolide antibiotics and major birth defects. Two independent researchers conducted the literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment. Meta-analysis was performed using the metan command in STATA 16 to pool the data. Results: Nine studies were included, selected from 6,002 articles, comprising seven cohort studies and two case-control studies. These studies covered 40,218 patients exposed to macrolide antibiotics in early pregnancy. Due to low heterogeneity among studies, a fixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. The results showed no significant association between early pregnancy exposure to macrolide antibiotics and the risk of major birth defects (OR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.97, 1.13]). Subgroup analysis of 11 types of major birth defects also found no such association, particularly for birth defects of the heart (OR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.96, 1.23]). Low heterogeneity and reduced risk of bias further enhanced the reliability of the findings. Conclusion: Existing evidence suggests that early pregnancy use of macrolide antibiotics does not increase the risk of major birth defects. In clinical practice, healthcare providers and pregnant women can use these antibiotics cautiously based on the specific infection situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.