ArticleVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal2025
Effects of human chorionic gonadotropin on reproductive outcomes in estrus-synchronized ewes subjected to two different insemination methods.
Article in Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the effects of a dose of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration at the time of insemination on the reproductive outcome of estrus-synchronized Mongolian ewes subjected to two artificial insemination methods during the breeding season. All females were treated with a polyurethane intravaginal sponge impregnated with 45.00 mg of flurogestone acetate for 12 days, followed by an intramuscular injection of 330 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin at sponge removal. In Experiment 1, 150 ewes were inseminated using a laparoscopic intrauterine artificial insemination method 48 hr after sponge removal. The ewes were randomly assigned to the hCG group which received 500 IU of hCG at the time of insemination, and the control group which received 1.00 mL of sterile saline solution. In Experiment 2, 85 ewes were inseminated twice at 48 and 60 hr after sponge removal using a cervical artificial insemination method. The ewes were randomly assigned to the hCG group, which received 500IU of hCG at the time of the first insemination and the control group which received 1.00 mL of sterile saline solution. The pregnancy rate in the control group was not significantly different compared to the hCG group in Experiment 1 and the pregnancy rate in the control group was significantly higher compared to the hCG group in Experiment 2. In conclusion, the administration of hCG at the time of insemination could not be recommended in ewes when implementing a fixed time artificial insemination protocol during the breeding season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.