ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
Sustaining Recovery After Low-Intensity Treatment for Anxiety and Depression in NHS Talking Therapies: A Multiphase Participatory and Consensus-Building Study of Stakeholder Priorities and Recommendations.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety and depression affect over 500 million people globally. Despite the availability of effective low-cost treatments, like those provided by NHS talking therapies (TT), over half of patients relapse within a year, highlighting the need to co-develop solutions to maintain wellbeing and optimise healthcare. This study used a multiphase participatory design to synthesise evidence on relapse prevention and collaboratively develop evidence-informed strategies for sustained mental health following low-intensity treatment. The three-phase project began by synthesising evidence from diverse sources. Phase 2 involved two patient and two NHS professional/key stakeholder co-design workshops, using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. A sustained patient and public involvement (PPI) group reviewed and refined findings, co-designing content for phase 3, which involved a mixed-stakeholder online meeting to finalise key recommendations and priorities. Phase 1 identified 41 evidence-based solutions for rating during phase 2. Across the four phase 2 workshops (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.