ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Spatio-temporal trends and socio-environmental determinants of suicides in England (2002-2022): an ecological population-based study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Suicide mortality in Spain (2010-2022): temporal trends, spatial patterns, and risk factors.International journal of health geographics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the last two decades of suicide prevention strategy implementation, suicide rates in England have shown a fluctuating pattern, declining from the early 2000s (10.3 deaths per 100,000 in 2002) until around 2010 (9.0 deaths per 100,000 in 2007), then gradually increasing (10.7 deaths per 100,000 in 2022). It remains unclear whether the pattern varies by local area, the influence of the socio-environmental factors or a combination of both. Our aim was to evaluate spatio-temporal trends of suicides in England from 2002 to 2022 whilst examining the role of socio-environmental characteristics. Methods: In this ecological study, we analysed Office for National Statistics data on deaths by suicide, exploring spatial and temporal patterns in England (2002-2022). Using a Hurdle Poisson model fit within a Bayesian hierarchical framework, we assessed the effects of local area level deprivation, ethnic density, population density, light pollution, railway and road network densities and greenspace composition on suicide risk. Findings: From 2002 to 2022, suicide risk across England showed no substantial change overall (-4.26%; 95% Credible Interval (CrI): -8.95%, 0.72%). The difference between the regions with the lowest (London) and highest (North East) risk was 39.2% (95% CrI: 34.1%, 44.3%). We found that for one standard deviation change in each covariate, suicide risk increased with deprivation (20.06%; 95% CrI: 18.48%, 21.65%), railway network density (1.37%; 95% CrI: 0.32%, 2.46%), and road network density (5.16%; 95% CrI: 3.12%, 7.46%) while risk decreased with ethnic density (-7.47%; 95% CrI: -8.91%, -6.00%), population density (-5.42%; 95% CrI: -7.34%, -3.25%), light pollution (-4.20%; 95% CrI: -5.71%, -2.72%), and greenspace composition (-6.43%; 95% CrI: -7.94%, -4.99%). Interpretation: We did not find evidence to support a decline in suicide rates in England over the last 20 years and our findings highlight the community profiles, characterised by greater deprivation, isolation, and access to road/rail networks, where suicide risk was highest. This should help focus future research to understand these as drivers of suicide risk, leading to the development of effective area-level interventions and targeted investment in those approaches where most needed. Funding: Wellcome Trust, UKHSA, MRC, NIHR through its HPRU, HDRUK, NIHR University College Hospital London (UCLH) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.