ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2026
Association Between Three Lung Donor Scores and Lung Acceptance in DBD and DCD Donors.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of extended criteria donors (ECD) has become increasingly important in lung transplantation to address organ donor shortages. To better assess lung graft quality and optimize donor selection, several scores have been developed. This study assesses whether Swiss lung acceptance practice is associated with three validated lung donor scores - the Oto Score, Eurotransplant Score (ET), and Zurich Donor Score (ZDS) - in both DBD and DCD donors. Due to limited clinical data, certain parameters of the Oto and ET Scores were adapted (aOto and aET). Data from 1515 actual deceased donors between 01.07.2014 and 30.06.2024 were analyzed. Logistic regression and AUC-ROC analysis were used to evaluate the scores' discriminative ability. Results showed that all three scores were associated with lung acceptance, with AUC values indicating acceptable to moderate discriminative ability - 0.75 for aOto, 0.70 for aET, and 0.77 for ZDS - and DCD donors being consistently less likely to be accepted for lung transplantation compared to DBD donors. Nonetheless, all three scores showed limitations as standalone models. Developing a novel, nationally applicable Swiss prediction tool integrating current lung acceptance criteria and recipient factors could improve donor-recipient matching, support more efficient organ utilization, and potentially increase transplant activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.