Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623996›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2026

Instances of Moral Distress in Medical Education: Recognition and Approaches.

Pamela Jofré, Rodrigo Vergara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pamela JofréNarrative Medicine Laboratory and Department of Pediatric, School of Medicine, University of Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.
Rodrigo VergaraNarrative Medicine Laboratory and Department of Pediatric, School of Medicine, University of Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The care of sick people is a moral issue. In a highly technological era, it risks becoming a matter of repairing unhealthy bodies by means of evidence-based strategies, neglecting the human component. To teach these issues has become a challenge and ignoring it has important consequences. Andrew Jameton described moral distress in medicine in 1984 as the negative feelings that arise when one feels compelled to act against what one considers morally correct. It is usually due to external or organizational circumstances, but in the case of health careers students , residents or young professionals, it is hierarchies that often impose themselves as a relevant factor, affecting the moral decisions the students would make if the case that such hierarchies did not exist. The issue is complex, because long-term consequences have been described, which have to do with exhaustion, disenchantment with the chosen profession, low job satisfaction and therefore demotivation, depersonalization and moral scars. The latter is a topic currently on the rise in the literature, probably motivated by post COVID-19 era. This text will emphasize the need to address moral distress in medical education, and will try to show some strategies to address it.

Indexed as

Medical educationMoral distressNarrative medicine

Identifiers

PMID41623996
PMCPMC12858434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.