ReviewJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2026
Applications and Challenges of Virtual Reality in Medical Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) technologies are interactive multimedia environments that serve as popular educational tools for teaching various groups. This study aimed to explore the applications of VR in the education of different medical science groups, including medicine, medicalresidents, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, etc., in a systematic review format. This technology provides unique opportunities for learners to immerse themselves in experiences, leading to increased understanding and practical skills in the field of medical sciences. Therefore, this study was conducted in 2023 to examine the applications and challenges of VR in medical science education through a systematic review. Methods: This study systematically extracts published articles through keyword searches from 1970 until March 14, 2023, in Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochran Library, PubMed, ProQuest and IEEE. To evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies, we used the STROBE checklist. All stages were carried out by two researchers, and the final selected articles were summarized in tables. Results: This review included 26 studies from an initial pool of 22,160 identified articles. The analysis revealed six key themes regarding the use of these technologies: their impact on learning outcomes, increased student motivation, enhanced self-confidence, improved teamwork, their role as tools for curriculum integration, and associated challenges. Collectively, the reviewed studies suggest that such technologies contribute positively to learning satisfaction, academic performance, public speaking confidence, and collaborative skills. Additionally, they serve as effective supplementary tools in educational settings. Nevertheless, several studies reported potential side effects, including dizziness, nausea, and eye strain. Conclusion: This study showed that the use of technologies like VR improved learning, motivation, and teamwork, but there were challenges in their implementation. It is recommended that these technologies should be integrated into the curriculum and training workshops should be held for their effective use. Additionally, policymakers should provide financial resources and national guidelines to support the expansion of these technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.