ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Interpretable machine learning for yak milk feeding pattern discrimination: Integrating XGBoost with multidimensional explainability analysis.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Dairy Quality Assessment: From Advanced Sensing Technologies to Explainable Intelligence.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately identifying grazing (GZ) and supplementary feeding (SF) patterns in yak milk is important for product authentication; however, current methodologies are often expensive and time consuming. In this study, we examined 523 milk samples of lactating yaks at four stages of SF and tested 21 machine learning algorithms to develop a rapid and cost-effective classification method using routine compositional parameters. Ensemble learning techniques performed better than others, with XGBoost having the best accuracy (92%) and AUC (0.94). Multidimensional interpretability analyses, including SHAP, PDP, and ICE, identified fat content (27.8%) and lactose (23.1%) as the most important discriminators, along with biologically meaningful interactions, such as between fat, lactose, and freezing point. This interpretable framework provides a practical, low-cost method for milk authentication of yaks using ordinary dairy analyzers, providing a methodological foundation for the establishment of standardized GZ certification systems in milk production from yaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.