ReviewBiomaterials translational2025
An exploration into the principles and theoretical progress of fracture treatment based on the mechanism of fracture healing.
Review in Biomaterials translational, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing biomedical innovation through composite material strategies.Biomaterials translational · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures are a common category of diseases in the field of orthopaedics with a high incidence in archaeologically obtained bones. These diseases may occur in various human activities. In the context of technological advancement, the annual incidence of fractures is increasing due to traffic accidents, sports injuries, and ageing. Besides, the classification of fracture diseases is also changing, making them one of the main orthopaedic diseases that affect the quality of life of patients and national medical expenditure. There are some basic principles in the treatment of fractures, and the understanding of the causes, types, and pathogenesis of fractures is constantly improved with technological development. Hence, there are sustained efforts to explore fracture treatment methods and examine even widely popular concepts, such as Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesis (AO) and biological osteosynthesis (BO) principles. However, nonhealing fractures, fracture infections, and other treatment problems can still not be eliminated based on these concepts. In addition, some new perspectives on the treatment principles of fractures have been proposed by surgeons based on their clinical experience. In this paper, the latest research results on fracture healing are summarised, and our views and opinions on the application of AO or other new concepts in fracture treatment are also elucidated. During the investigation of the advantages and disadvantages of fracture treatment concepts, the shortcomings of current fracture treatment strategies or theories are also reviewed. These findings may provide clinicians with theoretical support for fracture treatment and inspire scholars to delve into fracture treatment principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.