Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Influencing public acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare delivery.

Selin Aras, Calvin Drakos, Vineesha Manimangalam, Moiz Ali Nasir, Christina Burns, Davey Smith, Ozlem Equils

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Selin ArasMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Calvin DrakosMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Vineesha ManimangalamMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Moiz Ali NasirMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Christina BurnsMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Davey SmithDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Ozlem EquilsMiOra, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform healthcare delivery and reduce costs, adoption remains uneven across populations. Understanding the demographic, behavioral, and cognitive factors influencing public willingness to use AI-powered health tools is critical for equitable implementation. This study examined determinants of AI adoption in healthcare among adults in the United States (U.S.). Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between March and June 2024 using convenience sampling across the U.S. The study included 568 adult respondents recruited via Qualtrics. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, digital health behaviors, self-reported health status, cognitive and attitudinal factors, and behavioral intentions related to AI use in healthcare. Logistic regression models were used to examine associations between predictors and willingness to adopt AI, with z-tests for subgroup comparisons and Bonferroni correction applied for multiple hypothesis testing. Results: The sample was predominantly female (66.7%) and Hispanic/Latino (50.7%), with moderate income and education levels. Older age was negatively associated with AI adoption ( Discussion: AI adoption in healthcare is shaped by the interaction of demographic, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. While AI has the potential to expand healthcare access, adoption patterns reflect existing disparities in healthcare access and trust. Trust emerged as a central determinant, with AI functioning as a compensatory tool when traditional healthcare access is limited. Given the U.S.-specific context, findings should be interpreted as exploratory and may not generalize to other healthcare systems. These results highlight the need for future research on transparency, digital literacy, and structural barriers to support equitable implementation of healthcare AI.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebehavioral modelshealth anxietyhealthcare deliverypublic trustsocial cognitive theorytechnology adoptiontheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID41623889
PMCPMC12853031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.