ArticleBioinformation2025
Evaluation of fracture resistance among endodontically treated teeth using constant, variable and guiding taper endodontic file systems.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canal preparation is a critical step in endodontics because it involves removing a significant amount of dentin, which can weaken the root structure and lead to vertical root fractures. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the effect of rotary files with constant, variable and guiding tapers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, as well as to assess the mode of fracture. Eighty freshly extracted human mandibular premolars were decoronated, simulated for periodontal ligament, embedded in acrylic resin blocks and subsequently instrumented using JIZAI, ProTaper Ultimate and XP-endo Rise systems. After obturation, fracture resistance was tested with a universal testing machine. The results showed that among the experimental groups, XP-endo Rise had the highest fracture resistance, which was statistically significant (p<0.05) compared to ProTaper Ultimate and JIZAI, indicating better preservation of dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.