Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623831›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Retention and satisfaction of single-implant mandibular overdentures in geriatric patients: A prospective study.

Sameer Chauhan, Sai Priyanka Gaddipati, Chirag Raghuvir Rudakia, Pratiksha Sahare, Nagaveni S Somayaji, Gandikota Guru Karthik, Rahul Tiwari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sameer ChauhanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Sai Priyanka GaddipatiGeneral Dentist, Kamyar Saeian DDS, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Chirag Raghuvir RudakiaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, AMC Dental College, Kokhra, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Pratiksha SahareDepartment of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Nagaveni S SomayajiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Gandikota Guru KarthikDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Narayana Dental College and Hospital and Sparks Dental Clinic and Skin, Aesthetic Centre, Nellore andhra Pradesh, India.
Rahul TiwariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-implant mandibular overdentures have been proposed as a minimally invasive and cost-effective alternative to the two-implant standard, particularly suitable for geriatric patients. In this prospective study, 33 elderly patients received a single midline implant supporting an overdenture, and outcomes were evaluated for implant survival, prosthodontic maintenance, and patient satisfaction. The results demonstrated a 97% implant survival rate, with only minimal maintenance interventions such as matrix replacement and denture base adjustments required. Patient satisfaction improved markedly, rising from a baseline mean score of 45.0 to over 82.0 at 3 months, and remained stable at 12 months (p < 0.001). These findings confirm that single-implant mandibular overdentures provide reliable retention, high satisfaction, and favorable survival outcomes, establishing them as a practical solution for geriatric populations.

Indexed as

geriatric dentistryimplants survivalMandibular overdenturepatient satisfactionprosthodontics

Identifiers

PMID41623831
PMCPMC12859315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.