Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623800›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Role of AI in the analysis of total knee arthroplasty.

Anuraag Mohanty, Priyankar Nanda, Preethiv Rajendran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anuraag MohantyDepartment of Orthopedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Priyankar NandaDepartment of Orthopedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Preethiv RajendranDepartment of Orthopedics, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, KIIT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective cohort assessed a ChatGPT-based AI model for 1-year KOOS prediction and infection risk in 98 primary total knee replacement (TKR) patients. The model predicted based on preoperative clinical, demographic, and intra-operative data. The model under predicted the mean knee injury and osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) by 7-8 points compared to surgeon-reported outcomes (p = 0.02) with moderate correlation (r = 0.45).Predicted risk of infection (2.4%) was nominally higher than observed (1.8%), with an ROC-AUC of 0.70. Directionally accurate, the model requires further fine-tuning prior to clinic use.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChatGPTKOOS scoremachine learningoutcome predictionperi-prosthetic joint infectionROC analysisTotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID41623800
PMCPMC12859300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.