ArticleBioinformation2025
A randomized comparative study on successional versus premixed intrathecal administration of hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.75% and fentanyl in elective urological surgery.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of successional versus premixed administration of fentanyl and hyperbaric ropivacaine for urological surgeries is of interest. Hence, a total of 56 patients were randomized into two groups: Group P received a premixed solution and Group S received fentanyl followed by ropivacaine. Results showed that Group S had an earlier onset and longer duration of sensory and motor blocks, with more stable hemodynamics. Side effects were comparable between the two groups. Thus, we show that successional administration provides faster onset, prolonged block duration and better hemodynamic stability with minimal side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.