ArticleBioinformation2025
Clinical and radiographic changes in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The comparison between immediate and delayed dental implant placement is addressed in this study, with a focus on evaluating the clinical and radiological outcomes, including plaque scores, probing depths, soft tissue health, and bone density changes over six months. Therefore, it is of interest to compare immediate versus delayed dental implant placement, focusing on clinical and radiological outcomes. Key objectives included evaluating plaque scores, probing depths and soft tissue health and bone density changes over six months. A randomized trial with 20 implants (10 immediate, 10 delayed) was conducted, assessing clinical parameters at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Results showed that immediate implants initially had higher plaque scores and probing depths, but improved over time, while delayed implants demonstrated better bone density. Thus, both methods yielded favorable outcomes, with the choice of technique based on patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.