Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623758›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparison of TAPP and open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs in India.

Shubh Narayan Ghanghoriya, Divya Sengar, Pooja Parashar, Manoj Kela, Sachin Parmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shubh Narayan GhanghoriyaDepartment of General Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (SAIMS), Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India.
Divya SengarDepartment of General Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (SAIMS), Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India.
Pooja ParasharDepartment of General Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (SAIMS), Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India.
Manoj KelaDepartment of General Surgery, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (SAIMS), Indore,Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sachin ParmarDepartment of Community Medicine, V.K.S. Government Medical College, Neemuch, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inguinal hernia repair remains one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures globally, with an estimated 20 million surgeries conducted annually. Our study compares the standard method to Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) for fixing an inguinal hernia. Therefore, it is of interest to do Comparison of TAPP and open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repairs in India. TAPP repair demonstrated significantly shorter operative time, reduced hospital stay, faster return to work and fewer postoperative complications. Both techniques were effective; however, TAPP offered superior recovery outcomes. Data support the growing preference for minimally invasive approaches in hernia surgery.

Indexed as

Inguinal herniaLichtenstein repairminimally invasive surgerypostoperative outcomesTAPP repair

Identifiers

PMID41623758
PMCPMC12859262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.