ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026
An integrated system from microscopy to AI for real-time object detection in endometrial cytology.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cytology, which is minimally invasive and available as an outpatient procedure, is widely used in Japan for early detection of endometrial cancer, but its diagnostic process is time-consuming and requires expert diagnosticians. We developed a real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted system using a standard microscope, a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, and the You-Only-Look-Once version 5x (YOLOv5x) (a well-established object detection model) to support endometrial cytology screening in resource-limited settings. A total of 146 pre-operative cytology cases were collected, and the model was trained to detect abnormal cell clusters. The system was evaluated in real-time using a CCD camera, and its diagnostic performance was compared with that of three pathologists and four medical students. In an independent test of 20 cases, the AI model achieved an accuracy of 85%, showing promising performance comparable to the average accuracy of 75% among human evaluators. Furthermore, the median diagnostic time was reduced by approximately 45% with AI assistance. The impact of AI support varied by user expertise, with notable improvements among non-specialists. This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of affordable, real-time AI support for endometrial cytology using widely available equipment. Further validation with larger, multicenter datasets is warranted to confirm the generalizability and clinical utility of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.