ArticleDigital health
Early prediction of low birth weight using boosting ensemble machine learning: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low birth weight (LBW) is a leading cause of death for newborns and increases chronic disease risks later in life. Early identification of LBW risk is crucial. Aim: The objective of this study was to develop predictive models for LBW using boosting ensemble machine learning, with a focus on features available during early pregnancy, such as pre-pregnancy body mass index, body height, and blood pressure before 20 weeks of pregnancy. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. We used electronic medical records in four hospitals in Taiwan where pregnant women received prenatal care from January 2016 to July 2019, including 6719 pregnant women. Data preprocessing involved normalization, one-hot encoding, and a synthetic minority oversampling technique for class imbalance. Boosting ensemble methods were used to build the LBW predictive models. Results: The mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in early pregnancy (<20 weeks) was 66.5 mmHg, 29.6% had experienced abortion, 8.7% delivered LBW, 12.2% were overweight or obese before pregnancy, and 18.3% had elevated or stage I hypertension before 20 weeks of pregnancy. Lightweight Gradient Boosting Machine was the best-performing LBW model, with an area under curve of 0.96 and an accuracy of 93.4%. Early pregnancy DBP, maternal height, and number of abortions were the most important features. Conclusions: The LBW prediction model performed well. Nurses could use the model to assess LBW risk and intervene early. Preventive efforts could be directed to blood pressure management starting early pregnancy, nutritional support for short mothers, and self-care for women with a history of abortions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.