ArticleDigital health
Optical flow visual stimuli induce body sway and visually-induced motion sickness in virtual reality system: A preliminary study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Visually-induced motion sickness (VIMS) remains an unsolved issue when using head-mounted displays (HMD) in immersive virtual reality (VR) systems. We investigate the influence of restricted visual field on sensorimotor incongruence of postural control in an immersive VR environment, as a surrogate marker of VIMS while standing steadily and viewing ambiguous optical-flow visual stimuli. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy participants wore HMD and viewed optical flow visual stimuli (called the plaid motion pattern) using a VR system. Visual stimuli were presented on a full-screen display, either only in the center or periphery of the visual field, or nowhere (Natural). To evaluate standing posture stability, we measured spatial (length and area of the center of the pressure (COP)) and temporal dynamics of body sway using a stabilometer. Subjective feelings of VIMS were assessed for each visual stimulus condition. Results: The full-screen condition significantly worsened the COP measurements and feelings. The COP areas of standing balance under the center of the visual field condition were significantly smaller than those under the full-screen condition; however, the periphery of the visual field condition was comparable to the full-screen condition. The condition effects for the conditions (natural, center of the visual field, periphery of the visual field and full-screen) were observed in the COP measurements and subjective feelings. Conclusion: Optical-flow visual stimuli can induce body sway, suggesting sensorimotor incongruence in postural control. Ancillary findings demonstrated that subsequent to full-screen presentation, the periphery of the visual field potentially contributes to spatial and temporal dynamics of body sway and the sensorimotor incongruence rather than the central area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.