ArticleDigital health
Multimodal CT radiomics combined with machine learning algorithms to differentiate benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Although radiologists typically rely on imaging characteristics of pulmonary nodules for preoperative evaluation, the inherent subjectivity of this approach often leads to high misdiagnosis rates. This study comparatively analyzed the diagnostic value of non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCECT) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules using multi-regional radiomics and machine learning algorithms. Methods: This retrospective collection included 194 patients who underwent NCECT and CECT scans. Radiomics features were extracted by identifying the intra-nodular and peri-nodular 5 mm area as the region of interest. Six different machine learning classifiers were used to select the most effective classifier to create a predictive model. The efficacy of the models was measured by the area under the curve, further analysis of the combined model was conducted through calibration curves and decision Curve Analysis curves. Additionally, 78 patients were collected as an external validation cohort. Results: The logistic regression classifier showed the best stability. In the single-region analysis, the model developed based on features extracted from the intra-nodular regions of interest in contrast-enhanced CT scans yielded a significantly higher AUC value compared to the other three single-region models. The combined regions of non-contrast CT achieved an AUC of 0.901, similar to the contrast-enhanced CT combined regions. Furthermore, the NCECT model achieved an AUC of 0.863 in external validation, further confirming its robustness. Conclusions: The multiple regional features model of intra-nodular and peri-nodular outperformed single-region models in differentiating malignant from benign nodules. Furthermore, the combined model of NCECT demonstrated comparable efficacy to CECT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.