Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623711›Full record

ReviewBioscience2026

Resilient Biodiversity Conservation: Working with Social-Ecological Connections to Navigate Crises.

Erik Andersson, Romina Martin, Pippin Anderson, Shirley Brooks, Gonzalo Cortés Capano, Alberto González-García, Viola Hakkarainen, Marion Jay, Sandra Lavorel, Margot Neyret and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erik AnderssonFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-5502
Romina MartinStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pippin AndersonDepartment of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Shirley BrooksDepartment of Geography, Environmental Studies, and Tourism, University of Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.
Gonzalo Cortés CapanoDepartment of Agricultural, Economics, and Rural Development, University of Göttingen Göttingen, and Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences at the University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Alberto González-GarcíaLaboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Viola HakkarainenFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Marion JayDepartment of Agricultural, Economics, and Rural Development, University of Göttingen Göttingen, and Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences at the University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Sandra LavorelLaboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Margot NeyretLaboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Grenoble, France.
Tobias PlieningerDepartment of Agricultural, Economics, and Rural Development, University of Göttingen Göttingen, and Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences at the University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Christopher M RaymondFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Ecosystems and Environment Research Programme, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7165-885X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity conservation needs to adjust and keep adjusting to changing conditions. This is largely a matter of connections-across land uses, between people and the landscapes they inhabit, and between sectors and governance levels. Connections play an important role in shaping landscape dynamics and in the ability of conservation practitioners to be able to draw on resources outside their often limited mandates or authority. Focusing on disruptions, in this study, we discuss the current understanding of three interlinked aspects of conservation where active work with building and strengthening connections can help make recovery easier: landscape cohesion, societal appreciation and support for conservation, and the ability to rewire collaborations and bridge organizational and administrative boundaries. Specifically, we highlight how emerging insights on temporal shifts in connections, from spatial ecology to environmental psychology and crisis preparedness, inform and outline a research agenda for better situating conservation in complex landscapes undergoing frequent changes and disruptions.

Indexed as

biodiversity conservationcrisis managementcross-scale dynamicsdisruptionssocial–ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID41623711
PMCPMC12856199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.