ArticleBioscience2026
A Psychological and Linguistic Analysis of "The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth".
Article in Bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decarbonization at What Cost? Assessing the Agricultural Economic Impact of Mitigation Policy: Evidence From Net-Zero Targets.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Article
- Time-series analysis of the incidence trend of heat stress-related disorders in a hot and humid climate in a process industry.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Call to Address the Generative AI-Environment Paradox in Graduate Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- Fire and Snow: Effects of Snowpack Variation and Wildfire on Small Mammal Dynamics in Sub-Alpine Habitats.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- A Psychological and Linguistic Analysis of "The 2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth".Bioscience · 2026Article
- Biochar to improve the thermal performance of living wall systems: laboratory assessment of three planting substrates.Biochar · 2026Article
- Towards Green Cardiovascular Care: Carbon Footprint Analysis in the Management of Coronary Artery Disease.Korean circulation journal · 2026Article
- Global sampling decline erodes science potential of natural history collections.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Influence of CORSC advances · 2025Article
- Natural History Collections at the Crossroads: Shifting Priorities and Data-Driven Opportunities.Ecology letters · 2025Article
- Planetary Health: why not empower the Sports and Exercise Medicine community to play the game of life well?BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- How scientists can contribute to the social movements essential to protecting climate and nature.npj climate action · 2025Article
- Acting on the Commercial Determinants of Health.Health promotion international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A traditional goal of science and environmental communication, including climate communication, has been to encourage disinterested or uninformed audiences to pay more attention to the world around them and to shift disinterest and apathy toward positive engagement with nature and proenvironment lifestyles. We conducted an empirical investigation of audience responses to key aspects of the world scientists' "2024 State of the Climate Report: Perilous Times on Planet Earth," focusing on whether the language of this article manages to sway readers to rethink their attitudes toward climate change. Across many variations, the textual prompts we gave to readers did
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.