ArticleCase reports in hepatology2026
Two Cases of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Misdiagnosed With Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease.
Article in Case reports in hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Two Cases of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Misdiagnosed With Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease.Case reports in hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor of vascular origin with an incidence of < 0.1/100,000. The disease is easily misdiagnosed. The aim of this article is to increase public awareness and vigilance of HEHE. We report two cases presenting with fever, abdominal discomfort, abnormal liver function, and jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen suggested hepatic stasis, venous compression, and ascites, and liver biopsy was initially misdiagnosed as hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), which did not improve with treatment. In the first case, a male patient, after liver transplantation, pathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses revealed hyperplasia of blood vessels in the liver tissue with dilated lumen and heterogeneous cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed and showed CD34 positivity, confirming the diagnosis of HEHE. The second female patient had liver bruising and ascites on imaging, and the first hepatic puncture was reported to be VOD, which did not improve with treatment. Repeat hepatic puncture was performed, and the diagnosis of HEHE was confirmed after a second repathology with additional immunohistochemistry for HEHE. These misdiagnosis cases highlight the challenge of diagnosing HEHE. This is the first report of misdiagnosis of HEHE as VOD. This article analyzes the underlying causes of misdiagnosis of HEHE and emphasizes the causes of imaging misdiagnosis and the importance of repeated hepatic puncture biopsy and immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of HEHE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.