ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Research hotspots and trends in robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology: a bibliometric review based on CiteSpace visual analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze the global research landscape of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology, identify developmental trends through visualization methods, and provide references and recommendations for future research directions. Methods: A retrospective bibliometric analysis was conducted using literature retrieved from PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection, covering the period from January 2005 to March 2025. CiteSpace 6.4.R1 software was used for data processing and visualization. Analyses included publication trends, keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering, and burst detection to construct knowledge maps and explore research dynamics. Results: A total of 498 publications were included in the analysis. The number of publications showed a clear upward trend. The author collaboration network was relatively dense, with an identifiable core research team. The University of Chicago emerged as the leading institution in terms of publication volume in the field of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Gundeti MS was the most productive author, contributing 51 published papers to the field. Keyword clustering analysis revealed 10 clusters, and burst detection identified 20 keywords with significant citation bursts. Conclusions: Current international research primarily focuses on disease classification and surgical techniques in robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Future studies should continue to explore the clinical potential of robot-assisted surgery, broaden its application scope, and promote the diversified development of pediatric urology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.