Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623662›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2021

Challenges and opportunities of mesoscopic brain mapping with fMRI.

Peter A Bandettini, Laurentius Huber, Emily S Finn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Towards whole brain mapping of the hemodynamic response function.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter A BandettiniSection on Functional Imaging Methods, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Laurentius HuberMR-Methods Group, Maastricht Brain Imaging Center, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Emily S FinnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH USA.

Funding

Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZIAMH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
Functional MRI Method DevelopmentZ01MH002783 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI BANDETTINI, PETER A · 2002 to 2008
$5.7M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 MH002783Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Layer fMRI, requiring 7T scanners, sophisticated pulse sequences, and advanced post processing methods, has emerged and matured as a field in the past decade. In the past two years, the rate of layer fMRI papers published has grown sharply as the noninvasive delineation of mesoscopic scale functional organization promises to uncover new insight into human brain processing. Understanding laminar activity and connectivity throughout the brain will take fMRI beyond being able to simply identify where and when activation is taking place as delineating laminar location will provide detailed directional feedforward and feedback activity which will add to the sophistication of circuit and network models, thus providing a bridge between invasive measures and those typically carried out on humans. This review outlines the methods used to achieve layer fMRI as well as the challenges. It emphasizes the value and necessity of deep imaging of individuals rather than relying on pooled multi-subject databases to boost sensitivity. It highlights recent studies that have explored layer fMRI in cognitive tasks as well as resting state connectivity studies that have revealed cortical hierarchy. Finally, it concludes with a perspective on what the field promises, the challenges that lay ahead, and the direction that the field may evolve.

Identifiers

PMID41623662
PMCPMC12858290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.