Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623547›Full record

ArticleEJHaem2026

A Pilot Project to Evaluate the Benefit of Additional Support in Haematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) Research Data Management on Behalf of Anthony Nolan and BSBMTCT.

Shelley Hewerdine, Greg Judge, Julia Lee, Henny Braund, Hugh Allen, John A Snowden, Ben Carpenter, Helen Blake, Yasika Venayakamoorthy, Victoria Potter and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJHaem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shelley HewerdineAnthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0959-0267
Greg JudgeAnthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK.
Julia LeeBritish Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Guy's Hospital London UK.
Henny BraundAnthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK.
Hugh AllenAnthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK.
John A SnowdenSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-3476
Ben CarpenterUniversity College London Hospitals London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7914-0799
Helen BlakeUniversity College London Hospitals London UK.
Yasika VenayakamoorthyUniversity College London Hospitals London UK.
Victoria PotterKing's College Hospital London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7108-5297
Timothy SmithKing's College Hospital London UK.
Lawrence VermeirKing's College Hospital London UK.
Steven G E MarshUCL Cancer Institute University College London - Royal Free Campus London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-4120
Neema P MayorAnthony Nolan Research Institute Royal Free Hospital London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-143X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The participation of transplant centres in research studies that request detailed follow-up data on included patients can be challenging due to the amount of time centre Data Managers have to complete additional requests. The Research Data Manager (RDM) Pilot Project was designed to support Anthony Nolan's longitudinal Patient/Donor project and provide real-world evidence of the benefit of additional and dedicated data management resources in transplant centres. Objectives: For Anthony Nolan to continue advancing the field of donor selection, up-to-date and accurate follow-up data is needed. This 12-month pilot project aimed to demonstrate how on-the-ground support could improve access to outcome data. Study Design: Following RDM placements at two participating centres, we reviewed the data quality and quantity collected, thus ensuring the methods used remain effective and are likely to result in successful and continuous data improvement. The cohort covered a broad timespan and included historical patient records, posing challenges in availability of prior data and long-term follow-up of discharged patients. Results: Following the placements, over 400 patients now have the most up-to-date and complete patient clinical outcome data available within the EBMT/BSBMTCT registry database for any group to study, reducing the burden on these centres to complete research data requests for these individuals. Trial Registration: The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Identifiers

PMID41623547
PMCPMC12859683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.