Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41623542›Full record

ArticleMateria socio-medica2025

Arterial Hypertension and its Impact on the Prescription of Combined Hormonal Contraception.

Mateja Legan, Lucija Vrabic Dezman, Naneta Legan Kokol, Marko Mlinaric

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materia socio-medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mateja LeganDivision of Gynecology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Lucija Vrabic DezmanPrimary Health Centre Kranj, Kranj, Slovenia.
Naneta Legan KokolPrimary Health Centre Grosuplje, Grosuplje, Slovenia.
Marko MlinaricOutpatient Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics Zagorje ob Savi, Zagorje ob Savi, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Combined hormonal contraception (CHC) is a widely accepted contraceptive method for women of reproductive age. It is considered a safe and user-friendly option for women without risk factors for cardiovascular diseases; however, it is contraindicated in women with established cardiovascular disease or overt risk factors. CHC increases the incidence of cardiovascular events through higher risk for thromboembolic events and potential increases of blood pressure. Objective: The aim of this article was to explain when and how arterial hypertension should be addressed as absolute and relative contraindication for CHC use as well as a possible consequence of CHC therapy. Methods: This is descriptive method which should be crucial to identify women who are not suitable candidates for CHC by thoroughly assessing their medical history, including current and previous conditions, evaluating potential risk factors, calculating body mass index (BMI), and regularly monitoring blood pressure and weight. Results and Discussion: Several explanations have been proposed to explain blood pressure elevations. The estrogenic component in CHC stimulates renin-angiotensin-Aldosterone system (RAAS) through increased hepatic production of angiotensinogen. The regulation of anti-diuretic hormone (ADH) through osmoreceptors may also be altered. Before prescribing CHC, gynecologists should conduct a thorough cardiovascular risk assessment. This should include a targeted questionnaire addressing cardiovascular disease history and risk factors, such as smoking and elevated lipid levels. Additionally, BMI calculation and blood pressure measurement should be performed. It is advisable to assess thyroid function by measuring THS levels at the initiation of CHC and every five years thereafter, as thyroid dysfunction is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, particularly arterial hypertension Laboratory testing should include lipid profiles, glucose levels and thyroid function assessment performed prior to initiating CHC and at regular intervals during its use. This article focuses on arterial hypertension addressing its role as both an absolute and relative contraindication for CHC use as well as a possible consequence of CHC therapy. Conclusion: Women with well-controlled arterial hypertension may, in certain circumstances, safely use CHC. The combination of estetrol and drospirenone holds promise as an ideal choice for women with arterial hypertension seeking CHC.

Indexed as

arterial hypertensioncardiovascular diseasescombined hormonal contraceptionrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41623542
PMCPMC12858270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.